![]() Accepts the configuration generated by the QSPI Configurator tool.Implements thread-safety for use with multi-threaded RTOS environment using the abstraction-rtos library.Supports asynchronous (non-blocking) read operation.Note that PSoC™ 6 supports up to 4 memory slots on the same QSPI block. This library accepts the configuration generated using the QSPI Configurator tool but supports only one memory slot. The read operation can be performed in either blocking or non-blocking manner by calling the corresponding function while the write and erase operations are implemented as blocking functions. Works fine now.Provides functions for interacting with an external flash connected through its Single SPI/Dual SPI/Quad SPI/Octal SPI interface. So i got it to work by clipping the cable of a M-F parallel extension and used the male end. I tried taking a picture to show you, but my camera doesn’t zoom in/focus close enough, plus it’s hard to see the numbers even with the naked eye. My BF not only noticed the M25, but also noticed when comparing to another Female parallel plug, that the numbers were reversed. So when i saw the schematic, and the matching pin numbers, i assumed the schematic was using the female port. Which would connect to pin 13 on the male plug. Where when facing at it, pin 1, is at the top left corner of the plug. I got the female parallel port off a very old laptop motherboard. Notice on the second schematic, the blue/black one.Īnd the numbers were backwords. He was military and was trained to notice the tiniest of details.į/viewtopic.php?p=91380#p91380 The female port i was using, had it’s numbers reversed.ġ: i should have been using the male port. It took a simple minded guy, to find the simple solution to my problem. Now it works, and sure enough my crappy bluetooth uart adapter, just became 10x less crappy. However my BF noticed it wasn’t right, and when i got home, told me the numbers were wrong and i was using the wrong port… I was using a schemtic to build a parallel spi programmer from the sparkfun forums, but they didn’t mention of the parallel port was male or female, so i guessed based off this one. My boyfriend figured out the problem after i left for work. If i can access the firmware, i can increase the baud to what ever i want, i’ll probably choose 28.8k or 38.4kĮither of which would be a major improvement over 9600 baud.Īlso, it’s limited to slave mode as is, if i can access the firmware (i have the software but not the hardware) then i can set it to master mode and have it connect to another bluetooth uart module. Which isn’t a hardware limitation, it’s just what’s set in the firmware. The only problem i have with this adapter, is it’s slow, it’s limited to 9600baud. commerce/produc … ts_id=9913īecause of the outdated firmware on my bluetooth adapter, the only way to reconfigure it, is via an SPI link. ![]() If i can reprogram it, then i could upgrade it with a command configurable firmware. It just happens to use the CSR bluecore chipset, which is common with many bluetooth uart adapters. It shows up when connected to a PC as a virtual serial port. It’s a bluetooth UART adapter with TTL serial lines. Unrelated examples like the PS2 controller are just no good to me. If you guys do the programming, just comment in it so i can figure out what you guys did, so i can learn from it. It’s for a CSR Bluecore 4 based bluetooth adapter if that helps. Though i’m sure someone has done it before. Like i said, i got no clue where to start. I doubt it would be something simple like that. I have no clue how to make MISO -> RX, and TX-> MOSI,īlah = parameters, which i wouldn’t know what to set. It’s not the connecting it that i have problems with, i can connect wires to pins. The software allows for serial or parallel and a few other types of connections. It’s to configure/program a bluetooth uart adapter. ![]() I’d want the Atom to be as transparent as possible. Just what ever i send to the serial port, goes to the SPI. I’m not trying to use the atom pro/nano as a master, or spi programmer, just a converter, i know this can be done with many a PIC chips. I could probably just leave CSB NC, or pull it down or something. The nano 18 supposed to support 3wire SPI. The atom pro being PCB/SMD based, is a little more fragile to be moved around. ![]() My thoughts for using the Nano 18, were because of it’s small package, i could make a board just for this… pop the nano18 in, do my programming, then pop it out and use the nano for something else. Aton Pro is fine too, I can always try converting the code between them. I was thinking of using the atom nano 18 for this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |